🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.