🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing number of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy could be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful starting point," commented one European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and fit for young users," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local government level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, further states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers show that states internationally are no longer content to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.